For years, the cross-border tax landscape was built on the assumption that a "person" is a taxpayer. But as modern business structures like US LLCs and UK LLPs become the norm, the line between an entity and its owners has blurred. Navigating the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) for Fiscally Transparent Entities (FTEs) is no longer a matter of simple arithmetic; it is a high-stakes investigation into the "tax trail" to determine who truly holds the right to treaty benefits.

During my early years as a tax advisor, I came across a situation that reshaped my understanding of cross-border structures. An Indian company was making a consultancy payment to a US-based LLC. Everything about the remittance process seemed routine…until I paused at the India-US DTAA and wondered: could the LLC even claim DTAA benefits?

That question cracked open a whole new dimension of cross-border taxation for me. Because when it comes to Fiscally Transparent Entities (FTEs), the real challenge isn't the tax rate, but the right to apply it at all.

Why this Article matters to You

Whether you're investing overseas, working with US consultants, or operating through cross-border structures, DTAA eligibility impacts your bottom line:

  • Save costs on withholding tax: Avoid unnecessary 40% rates when 15% is applicable.
  • Prevent disputes: Stay ahead of revenue authorities who scrutinize pass-through structures.
  • Ensure compliance: Hybrid entities like LLCs and trusts don't automatically qualify for benefits.

What is a Fiscally Transparent Entity (FTE)?

A fiscally transparent entity is one whose income is not taxed at the entity level, but instead passes through to its owners or beneficiaries, who are then taxed individually on their share of the income. These entities are often referred to as pass-through entities in US tax parlance.

In India, most entities are taxed at their own level. However, sole proprietorship and specific trusts are some exceptions where income is directly taxed at the owner's/ beneficiary's level.

What do Tax Treaties say about FTEs?

To understand eligibility, we look at guidelines laid out in international tax models like the OECD Tax Convention. Essentially, the principles are as follows:

How Courts View DTAA Eligibility

Judicial precedents have added shape and nuance to the idea of fiscal transparency. Here is how courts in India and abroad have ruled on these matters:

General Motors USA v. ACIT (2024) Issue: Indian affiliates denied 15% DTAA rate to a US LLC, claiming it wasn't a "resident." Result: Favorable

ITAT held that "liable to tax" includes indirect taxation at the member level.

Herbert Smith Free LLP v. CIT (2024) Issue: UK solicitors' firm denied DTAA as it was transparent under UK law. Result: Favorable

ITAT ruled benefits extend to FTEs if partners are taxed in the resident state.

Susquehanna v. Revenue Comm. (2025) Issue: Irish group sought relief for US income routed through a Delaware LLC. Result: Unfavorable

Foreign court ruled transparency without entity-level exposure failed the "liable to tax" test.

Key Takeaways for Compliance

The complexity of FTEs lies in how revenue authorities trace the flow of income. To help you stay compliant, here are the key questions you must ask:

  • Is the income ultimately taxed in the residence state—even if through the owner?
  • Have I conducted a full legal review including DTAA protocols and OECD commentaries?
  • Is my documentation robust, covering the Tax Residency Certificate (TRC) and Form 10F?

While the Indian judiciary is mostly favorable for now, global interpretations vary. Overlooking documentation can unravel an entire transaction.